flag.gif (7907 bytes)
Home

diehard4.gif (3611 bytes)

flag.gif (7907 bytes)
Home

Latest news   |  Editorial   |   Karmayogi


Demographics
World History
Indian History
Culture
Religion
Law & Order
Languages
Environment
Monuments
Population
Democracy
Indian Women

Overview
Infrastructure
Entertainment
India - News


Site Map
Search site
Subscribe

Refer this site to a friend

Karmayogi

Major Flaws in Aryan Invasion Theory

It is a firm belief of many historians, that thousands of years before birth of Christ, the white-skinned Europeans were a nomadic tribe still involved in primitive hunting and fishing, while Indians were building great cities and making steel out of iron. The theory is - while wandering, they came to the Sapthsindhu (Indus) civilization and were so much in awe with the richness of culture and knowledge of Indians, that they copied our ideas and (Sanskrit) language back to their homeland - Only to claim it to be their own thousands of years later!

  • A major flaw of the Aryan invasion theory was that it had no explanation for why the Vedic literature (that was assumed to go back into the second millennium BC) had no reference to any region outside of India.
  • The astronomical references in the Rig Veda allude to events in the third millennium BC and even earlier, indicating origin of Vedic hymns earlier than 3000 BC. If it is assumed that the so-called Aryans invaded the townships in the Harappa valley and destroyed its habitants and their civilization, how come after doing that they did not occupy these towns? The excavations of these sites indicate that the townships were abandoned.
  • And if the Harappan civilization had a Dravidian origin, who were allegedly pushed down to the south by Aryans, how come there is no Aryan - Dravidian divide in the respective literatures and historical traditions. Was the South India un-inhabitated prior to the pushing of the original population of Indus Valley? If not, who were the original inhabitants of South India, who accepted the newcomers from North without any hostility or fight?
  • Nowhere either in the religious scriptures or by tradition the word Arya denotes a race or a language. The difference between the so-called Aryans of the north and the Dravidians of the south or other communities of Indian subcontinent is not a racial type. Biologically all are of the same type, only when closer to the equator the skin gets darker, and under the influence of constant heat the bodily frame tends to get a little smaller. And these differences cannot be the basis of two altogether different races.
  • There is enough positive evidence in support of the religious rites of the Harappans being similar to those of the Vedic Aryans. Their religious motifs, deities and sacrificial altars bespeak of Aryan faith, indicating continuity and identity of Vedic culture with the Indus valley civilization.
  • If the Aryan Hindus were outsiders, why don't they name places outside India as their most holy places? Why should they sing paeans in the praise of India's numerous rivers crisscrossing the entire peninsula, and mountains - repositories of life giving water and natural resources, nay even bestow them a status of goddesses and gods. If Aryans were outsiders why should they consider this land as the 'holy land' and not their original land as the 'holy land' or motherland? For the Muslims, their holy place is Mecca. For the Catholics it is Rome or Jerusalem. For the Hindus, their pilgrim centers range from Kailash in the North, to Rameshwaram in the South; and from Hingalaj (Sindh) in the West to Parusuram Kund (Arunchala Pradesh) in the East. The seven holy cities of Hinduism include Kanchipurum in the south, Dwarka in the west and Ujjain in central India. The twelve jyotirlings include Ramashwaram in Tamil Nadu, Srisailam in Andhra Pradesh, Nashik in Maharashtra, Somnath in Gujarat and Kashi in Uttar Pradesh. All these are located in greater India only. No Hindu from any part of India has felt a stranger in any other part of India when on a pilgrimage. The seven holy rivers in Hinduism, indeed, seem to chart out the map of the holy land. The Sindhu and the Saraswati (now extinct) originating from the Himalayas and move westward and southwards into the western sea; the Ganga and the Yamuna also start in the Himalayas and move eastward into the north-eastern sea; the Narmada starts in central India and the Godavari starts in western India, while the Kaveri winds its way through the south to move into the southern sea.
  • More than a thousand years ago, Adi Shankaracharya, who was born in Kerala, established several mathas (religious and spiritual centers) including at Badrinath in the north (Uttar Pradesh), Puri in the east (Orissa), Dwaraka in the west (Gujarat), and at Shringeri and Kanchi in the south.
  • Bottomline - There is no mention of Conflicts in Vedic literature, findings of skeletons at the excavated sites of Mohanjodro and Harappa

That is ancient India, that is modern Bharat (Bhaarath), and that is Hinduism.

 

Back

Questions (FAQ's) or Comments (feedback) about this site? Email to damanig@diehardindian.com
Copyright © 2000 www.diehardindian.com. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy and Terms of Use

refriend.gif (3184 bytes)