|
Entertainment |
Laskhmi
N. Mittal chats with Business Week (28 August 2000)
Q: You have set up a company
with operations around the world. Up to this point, though, there haven't been too many
others that have done likewise. Do you think that will happen? In my opinion, the American companies never needed to look abroad because America has always imported 20, 30, 40 million tons of steel every year. They see there is still a lot of opportunity for growth here. So why go abroad and invest? U.S. steel companies remain regional, not even national.
Q: But U.S. companies in many other industries are
truly multinational. And many of the companies that steel companies sell to--the car
companies--are leading proponents of globalization. Q: What specific advantages accrue from being global? A: We have seen that as we are becoming global, we are becoming much more efficient, much more productive; we are able to reduce costs on a global basis. Like purchasing. We buy products through our central purchasing system, in Europe. They're able to aggregate our demand. We are able to have stronger muscle power to negotiate with our suppliers. On the operation side, as a global company, we are able to exchange our knowledge and experience at different companies around the world. If you look at our shareholder-value creation, the steel industry has earned only a 4% return on capital in the last 10 years. Many other industries have earned much more than 4%. They have consolidated. Their top 10 producers produce 85% of world output. The top 10 steel companies produce only 25% on a global basis.
Q: Are you done building? Q: Are there particular geographic gaps that you are looking at filling? A: Yes. Today, we are not present in emerging markets like South Korea, Philippines, Thailand. The Middle East may also offer opportunities for the future. So we will really have to expand our geography, as well as to consolidate in our existing regions.
Q: Do you see any new markets for steel? Q: So you're not worried that the automotive industry, which is one of your primary customers, is going to be building cars out of aluminum? A: I don't think it would be possible for them to replace steel to a large degree. Maybe there could be some shift by a couple of percent. But I don't think it would make a big difference to the steel industry.
Q: Are there one or two other steel companies that
you think are doing very well and that you'd like to emulate?
Q: What about in terms of production? Are there any
other companies beside Ispat that you think are doing well these days?
Q: Any you would name?
Q: If you had to describe the steel industry five
years from now, what do you think it would look like?
|
Back to "Success" |
|
Questions
(FAQ's) or Comments (feedback) about this
site? Email to
damanig@diehardindian.com |